Pay-if-paid: void, but still in the draft
Clarke v. Safeco killed the clause in California, while most other US states still enforce clearly drafted versions — which is why national contract templates keep it in. Leaving it unchallenged invites payment games even though it's unenforceable, and ambiguous pay-when-paid wording is generally read as a timing clause, not a transfer of the owner-insolvency risk. Strike it anyway, and check what surrounds it.
